HOME PAGE
“The Chaucers in Spain: from the wedding to the funeral” SELIM 8, 1998: 193-203.
Dr. Jesus Luis Serrano Reyes
Cordoba
Chaucer Life-Records
1 was the culmination of the extraordinary labours to attempt to cover Chaucer's biography. This handsome volume will be for many years the point of departure of any work on the poet's life. Since this excellent work was published in 1966, some books and articles have been published on this subject. Although there are significant and important contributions among them, such as Chaucer and his world (1978) by Derek Brewer, Chaucer: his Life, his Works, his World (1981) by Howard 2, and The Life of Geoffrey Chaucer (1993) by Derek Pearsall 3 some questions naturally still remain: the exact day of the poet's birth, his activity from 1360 to 1366 and nearly everything about his domestic life. "The problems of writing a life of Chaucer" 4 cannot lead us to the frustration of a natural wish to know everything about his life. We know that, as Derek Pearsall (1993: 2) says in answer to the question as whether it is worth writing a new biography of the poet:there are many who would think not, arguing one or more of the following: that it cannot be done, that it is not worth doing and that it has been done.
Many aspects of Chaucer's biography can give controversy such as the identify of the real father of Thomas Chaucer
5, the existence of two Philippas 6 or, even, the existence of two Chaucers7, although, so far as I know, his identity has never seriously been questioned.It is not the intention in this paper to invent a part of a biography, unsupported by real evidence, in order to fill some gaps in the poet's biography. This paper is concerned with Chaucer's marriage and the connection between the Chaucers and Spain. I will try to show how there were two important years for Chaucer's marriage: in 1366 the poet was in Spain and this was also the year of the wedding; in 1387 Philippa Chaucer was in Spain and it was 1387, the year she died. I am going to support my work on historical data from two sources: Chaucer Life-Records and Ayala's Chronicles
8 . The results of this verification will not provide the unanswerable documentary evidence but, I hope, they can be a contribution to a new starting point which can lead us to a better knowledge of Chaucer's life.
I.- 1366: Chaucer was in Spain and married Philippa
The publication of a short article by Suzanne Honori-Duvergi
9 revealing that Chaucer visited Spain with a safe-conduct, granted by the king of Navarre, cast some light on the obscurity of the period from October 1360 to June 1366. But, we cannot deduce (from this document) any clear reason for his journey.Several possible explanations have been suggested. Suzanne Honori-Duvergi believes "that Chaucer may have joined the forces of Trastamara and taken part in the military campaign"
10. There is a mistake in this opinion, as was pointed out by Thomas Garbaty in his important article "Chaucer in Spain, 1366: Soldier of Fortune or Agent of the Crown" 11.If it can be accepted that one can accept that Chaucer came to Spain to take part in that campaign, he did so, of course, on the side of Peter, the Cruel, who was allied with Edward III whose military forces were led by his son the Black Prince.
Another possibility was offered by Crow and Olson suggesting that Chaucer was an ordinary pilgrim to the shrine of St. James. Baugh however,(1968: 56) rejects both possibilities and when, referring to the second one, he states that "English pilgrims to Compostela habitually went to La Coruqa, in Galicia, by sea
12."This argument is not strong enough to reject Crow and Olson's opinion: pilgrims also went to Galicia by the "French route"
13.Chaucer may have been sent on a diplomatic mission: to negotiate with the king of Navarre, Charles II, the passage of the English military forces through his territory, but this was quite unlikely. The safe-conduct was valid from February 22 to May 24 of 1366, and the agreement with the king of Navarre was
14 in 1367.None of the above possibilities is supported by historical documents. However, this is my hypothesis: Chaucer went to Spain to persuade the English knights to abandon Henry of Trastamara so that the English military forces would fight on the side of king Peter. Baugh (1968: 69) and Pearsall (1993: 53) suggest the same idea but with no document to support it. And Baugh even casts doubt on Chaucer's success in his mission:
his misssion was a last minute attempt to make contact with the Gascon knights and seek to detach them from the enterprise. Whether he ever caught up with them is doubtful.
If we follow the steps of Hugh of Calveley, the most important English knight in the Companies on the side of Henry of Trastamara, in Ayala's Chronicles, we can find the answer.
Calveley had been a decisive help for the English victory in the struggle for Brittany and had begun to invade
15 Castile on March 1366 .Ayala (1991: 331-333) tells how Henry of Trastamara, who had invaded Castile and was proclaimed king of Castile, was aware of the Black Prince's proposals: "... que avma ya nuevas del prmncipe de Gales como venma a ayudar al rey don Pedro... e esto fue en el mes de febrero deste aqo
16."Peter, the Cruel, had fled from Seville to Galicia and finally to Bayonne asking for the Black Prince's help. It is significant that the period which covered Chaucer's safe-conduct was from February 22 to May 24, and in February Henry of Trastamara had news about the Black Prince's departure to Castile. Calveley had been successful in his attack on Calahorra in "early March". Was Chaucer successful in his misssion? Ayala (1991: 341) answers the question:
...Mosen Hugo de Caureley, que era un caballero inglis con quatrocientos de caballo de su compaqa, que tenma consigo de Inglaterra, partis del rey don Enrique, e fuese para Navarra, por quanto su seqor el Prmncipe de Gales venma de la otra parte, e non podma ser contra el. E el rey don Enrique, como quier que sopo que el dicho mosin Hugo partma del, e le pudiera facer algun enojo, non lo quiso facer, teniendo que el dicho caballero facma su debdo en se ir a servir a su seqor el prmncipe, que era fijo de su seqor el rey de Inglaterra
17.Chaucer's arguments convinced not only Sir Calveley but Henry of Trastamara himself. And Ayala's Chronicles reafirm this success: Sir Calveley not only abandoned Henry of Trastamara but also he took part in the battle of Najera against him 18 , and some days after the victory of Najera he, as a reliable person at the Black Prince's service, was sent as a messanger to the king of Aragon 19. Chaucer's success is beyond all doubt.
Was Philippa one of Chaucer's three companions, "not separately identified" who went with him to Spain in 1366? There is no record to prove it, we only can deduce a positive answer from other historical data. We know that Philippa is named as Chaucer's wife in a transaction on the Receipt Roll under 21 December 1381 (Life-Records, p. 77). Crow and Olson (1966: 68) say that:" The recipient of these annuity payments of 1381 had borne the name Philippa Chaucer when the annuity was granted on 12 September 1366."
We know that one " Philippa Chaucer una domicellarum camere Philippe regine Anglie" ( Life-Records, p. 67) received an annuity of ten marks on 12 September 1366. So, as Pearsall (1993: 50): says " she was given her husband's surname". And once again Crow and Olson (1966: 68) provide a valuable clue to support my hypothesis:
The maiden name of the wife occurs so frequentley in grants and payments made soon after marriage as to suggest that Philippa Chaucer had been married long enough by 12 Sep. 1366 to be already identified in the court as Geoffrey Chaucer's wife.
If " Chaucer had been married long enough by 12 Sep. 1366", was he married in the period of his safe-conduct (February 22 to May 24)? There are only three months from June to September. Was this period of time "long enough as to be identified in the court as Geoffrey Chaucer's wife? If we think that a positive answer to these two questions is a reasonable argument, the possibility that Philippa Chaucer's was in Spain in 1366 becomes more plausible. In any case, I belive, as Crow and Olson (1966: 68) that " Chaucer must have married her on or before 12 September 1366 unless her maiden name was Chaucer".This 1366 was the year of Chaucer's stay in Spain and the year of his wedding: an important year in his life.
II.- 1386-87: Philippa Chaucer was in Spain and died of pestilence
This conflict was to be the origin of John of Gaunt's claim to the Crown of Castile and Leon because, as it is well known, he married Constance of Castile, Pedro's daughter in 1371, and this was his most important link to Spain. His efforts to realise succeed in this clain would last sixteen years. The history of this period of time is included in Ayala's Chronicles. The last attempt was in 1386 when the Duke arrived at Galicia on 25 July, with his family:
Dende a pocos dmas llegaronle nuevas al maestre Davis csmo el duque de Alencastre era aportado con pieza de navmos e de gentes en la villa de la Coruqa, que es en Galicia, dma de Santiago, e csmo tomara y algunas galeas que falls del rey de Castilla, e que la gente que el dicho duque trama eran mil e quinientas lanzas, e otros tantos archeros, e todo de muy buena gente. E trama consigo su mujer doqa Constanza, que era fija del rey don Pedro, e una fija que avma della, que decman doqa Catalina. E trama otras dos fijas que el duque oviera primero de otra mujer con quien fuera casado antes, fija de otro duque de Alencastre e conde de Dervi que fuera antes que dil, e a la mayor decman doqa Phelipa, la cual cass entonce con el maestre Davis que se llamaba rey de Portugal, segund adelante diremos, e a la otra decman doqa Isabel, la cual cass entonce con un caballero que venma con el duque, que decman mosin Juan de Holanda, que fuera hijo de la princesa e de mosin Thomas de Holanda, e era entonce mosin Juan de Holanda en esa cabalgada, e el duque de Alencastre fmzole su condestable
20.If Philippa was in Constance's service, she ought to have been at her service in Galicia in 1386. Her husband's daughters were to marry important men and her own daughter Catherine would marry Henry III of Castile. Constance's need of household chores might be important enough to get rid of Philippa, who was not only granted but highly esteemed by her as Crow and Olson (1966: 86) clarify when they explain that the term "` nostre bien ame damoysele' is applied elsewhere in the register of John of Gaunt to ladies in immediate attendance upon the Duchess Constance 21."
Furthermore, her son Thomas Chaucer was probably of the party.
There is no record to prove that the Duke of Lancaster was Chaucer's patron 22 but there some records to demonstrate a close connection between the Chaucers and John of Gaunt:
* Philippa Chaucer received an annuity on 30 August 1372 for attendance upon the Duchess Constance and some gifts from 1373 to 1382.
* Geoffrey Chaucer and his wife received an annuity from Gaunt on 13 June 1374.
I agree with Derek Pearsall (1993: 83) when he comments on the Chaucers' annuity from Gaunt, in 1374, and says that "the annuity most probably continued to be paid until Gaunt's death in 1399". Although it is true, as he says, that "there is no documentary evidence of any futher personal connection between the poet and the prince", I think that, if there is anything, we would find it connected with the Duke of Lancaster's intervention in Spain. We know that there are no records of Gaunt's grants to Philippa after the gift on 6 May 1382 because, indeed, there are no records of any kind of Gaunt's household expenses since the Register broke off in 1383.
I think it is important to focus attention on the last and most important record concerning Philippa Chaucer's connection with The Lancaster House: her admission to the fraternity of Lincoln Cathedral. This admission does not only imply her relationship with her nephews (John Beaufort and Thomas Swynford), as it seems natural, but the importance of a " bien ame damoysele" (Life-Records, p. 86) in Gaunt's household. This important ceremony was held on 19 February 1386.
Regarding Gaunt's campaign in Spain in 1386 Derek Pearsall (1993: 142) thinks that " Philippa was not of the party. In 1386 she was probably residing more permanently with her sister in Lincolshire."
Where was Philippa Chaucer? I consider that the strong negative "was not of the party", in Pearsall's opinion, is weakened by the uncertainty of "probably residing..." We know that her sister Katherine Swynford sometimes dwelt at her manor in Kettlethorpe and that some of her payments were received in Lincolshire by a sheriff (Life-Records, p.77) in 1379. I believe that her relationship with Gaunt's mistress does not imply a relief of her duties in connexion with her "immediate attendance upon the Duchess Constance" just when Gaunt was very much interested in using his wife as a coin of exchange. It is well known, however, that John of Gaunt lost interest in Constance of Castile after returning from Spain in 1389. Pearsall (1993: 142), himself, says that,
During the early 1380s, Philippa probably shared her life between the household of her husband and that of the Duchess Constance, who spent more time with her husband now that his hopes of a throne in Spain were his main political ambition.
Can 1386 be included in these "early 1380s" taking into account that Gaunt's "hopes of a throne in Spain" were supported now by the king and by a subsidy of Parliament?
On the other hand, "in June 1386, Geoffrey and Philippa received an assignment upon William Barwell, who had been sheriff of Worcestershire in 1383," (Life-Records, p. 335) but this does not imply that Philippa Chaucer was there. It is not significant that, the fact that
After June 1386 Chaucer's payments were always in cash drawn at the exchequer by his own hands until, after the surrender of his annuity to John Scalby, he received a pro rata payment in February 1389 by the hands of Scalby. (Life-Records, p. 335)
Gaunt and the king of Portugal decided that they would stay in Galicia from 25 July 1386 until the following summer. But instead of increasing their power by making preparations for the attack they were defeated, before fighting, by the worst enemy: "pestilence". Therefore they did not wait until the summer, and in March 1387 they invaded Castile. Ayala narrates the situation
Despuis que entrs en Castilla, siempre ovo grand mortandad en sus compaqas, en guisa que perdis muchas gentes de las suyas; e segund se sopo por cierto, morieron trescientos caballeros e escuderos, e muchos archeros e otras gentes
23.Philippa Chaucer might have been among these "otras gentes", and probably died in Spain or Portugal of "pestilence". We do not have any record of her death but if, as Pearsall (1993: 25) says as regrads those who died of plague, " there were not enough living to bury the dead, and there were certainly not enough priests to give all the dying the last sacraments" it would be very difficult to find any record, mainly knowing how elusive Chaucer was about autobiographical references in his poetry.
Martin M. Crow and Clair C. Olson (1966: 84) conclude that:
Because for several terms Philippa Chaucer had drawn her annuity through her husband and because Geoffrey Chaucer drew only his own Michaelmas instalments on 7 November 1387, it would appear that her death ocurred sometime between 18 June 1387, when she drew her last payment, and 7 November of that year.
I hope that the new information drawn from our conclusion would help from now on in future research concerning this subject.
NOTES
1. I am chiefly grateful to Professor Martin M. Crow whose
opinion on the most important results of this paper, after reading some of my
works on Chaucer and Spain, has encouraged me.
All quotations are from Crow Martin M. & Calir C. Olson C., Chaucer Life-Records
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966). All quotations are from this edition and the
references to this volume will be incorporated into the text, under the abbreviation
Life-Records.
2. D. R. Howard, Chaucer: his Life, his Works, his World. New York: E.P. Dutton,
1981. I am very grateful to Martha S. Waller, retired Professor of Butler University,
for sending me Howard's references to Philippa Chaucer from this book, and for
her advice and corrections on this article.
3. I do not know how to express my gratitude to both these great scholars for
their correspondece connected with some of my research on this subject.
D. Pearsall, The Life of Geoffrey Chaucer (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).
D. Brewer, Chaucer and his world (Suffolk: Boydell & Brewer, 1978).
4. This is the title of Derek Pearsall's paper in the VII S.E.L.I.M. (Spanish
Society for Mediaeval Language and Literature), Conference held in Cáceres,
1994.
5. For a biography and discussion see K. B. McFarlane, "Henry V, Bishop
Beaufort and the Red Hat, 1417-1421", EHR 60 (1945), pp. 316-348, 332-337;
J. A. F. Thomson, "John de la Pole, Duke of Suffolk," Speculum, 54
(1979), pp. 528-42; E. A. Greening Lamborn, "The Arms on the Chaucer Tomb
at Ewelme", Oxoniensia, 5 (1940), pp. 78-93.
6. For this possibility, see D. Pearsall, op. ct., p. 35.
7. For this possibility, see, A. C. Baugh, "Chaucer the Man", Companion
to Chaucer Studies, edited by Beryl Rowland. London: O.U.P, 1968, p. 1.
8. J. L. Martín, ed., Pero López de Ayala. Crónicas ( Barcelona:
Planeta, 1991). All quotations are from this edition. The references to this
book will be incorporated in the text under the abbreviation Crónicas.
9.S. Honoré-Duvergé, "Chaucer en Espagne? (1366)", Recueil
de Travaux offert & M. Clovis Brunel , II (Paris: 1955), pp. 9-13.
10. Albert C. BAUGH, op. ct., p. 56
11. I cannot sufficiently express my gratitude to Professor Thomas J. Garbaty,
who sent me his article published in MLN, 5, (1967) and encouraged me to work
on this subject.
12. Albert C. BAUGH, Chaucer the Man", Companion to Chaucer Studies, ed.
Beryl Rowland (London: O.U.P., 1968).
13. See Vázquez de Parga, J. M. Lacarra, & Uria, Peregrinaciones
a Santiago, (Madrid: 1948).
14. "...el rey de Navarra fuese para Pamplona, e estovo allí, e
fizo otros tratos con el rey Don Pedro e con el príncipe de Gales en
esta manera: que el rey de Navarra les diese el paso por el puerto de Roncesvalles,"(Crónicas,
p.331)
"The king of Navarre went to Pamplona and stayed there and made other treaties
with king Peter and with the Prince of Wales as follows: that the king of Navarre
would allow them free entry to enter through the mountain pass of Rouncesval."
15. "Early in March Calveley opened the attack by turning north and following
the course of the Ebro, passed through the southern tip of Navarre, and reached
Alfaro in Castilian territory. When the town refused to surrender he pushed
on to Calahorra." Baugh, "Chaucer the Man" , p. 65.
16 . " They had heard about how the Prince of Wales was coming to help
king Peter..., and this happened in February of that year."
17. (Crónicas, p. 341)" The knight Hugo of Carvely, who was an English
knight with four hundred cavalrymen from England, abandoned king Henry, and
went to Navarre because his lord, the Prince of Wales was coming from the other
direction and he could not fight against him. And when king Henry knew that
this Hugo had left him, and he could have done him some harm, nevertheless he
did not wish to do so, considering that this knight was doing his duty by his
lord the Prince, who was the son of the king of England."
18."De la parte del rey don Pedro fue ordenada la batalla en esta guisa.
Todos vinieron a pie, e en la avanguardia venía el duque de Alencastre,
hermano del príncipe, que decían don Juan, e mosén Juan
Chandós, que era condestable de Guiana por el príncipe, e mosén
Raúl Camois, e mosén Hugo de Caureley, e Mosén Oliver,
señor de Clison, e otros muchos caballeros e escuderos de Inglaterra
e de Bretaña." (Crónicas, 344).
" On the side of king Peter the battle was planned as follows: everyone
was on foot, and the Duke of Lancaster, who was called John, the Prince's brother,
was in the vanguard with the knight John of Chandos, who had been appointed
by the prince the military chief of Guiana, and Raul Camois, and Hugo of Calveley,
and Oliver, lord of Clison, and many other knights and squires from England
and Brittany."
19."Otrosí el príncipe de Gales envió luego al rey
de Aragón por mensajero a mosén Hugo de Caureley, un
caballero de Inglaterra a tratar con él sus amistades," (Crónicas,
360).
" And afterwards the Prince of Wales sent Hugo of Calveley, a knight from
England, as a messanger to the king of Aragon to draw up a treaty of friendship
with him."
20. (Crónicas, p. 614) " the Grand Master Davis had news a few days
previously of how the Duke of Lancaster had arrived with ships and militarymen
in the town of La Coruña, which is in Galicia, the day on St. James,
and how he took some ships of the king of Castile, and among the soldiers there
were 1500 lancers and a like number of archers and all of them were good. And
he brought with him his wife Constance, who was the daughter of king Peter and
a daughter who had been born of her, who was called Catherine, and he brought
two other daughters the Duke had of another woman whom he had previously married,
who was the daugther of the former Duke of Lancaster and Earl of Derby; the
elder daugther was called Philippa, who married the Grand Master Davis, who
was called king of Portugal, as we shall tell later on, and the other daughter
was called Elisabeth, who then married a knight who came with the Duke, who
was called John of Holland, who was son of the princess and Thomas of Holland,
because the Duke of Lancaster had made him his military chief."
21. For further clarification, see the reference to the annuity of ten pounds
granted to Philippa Chaucer on 30 August 1372 in Chaucer Life-Records, pp. 85-86.
22. John of Gaunt styled himself "roy de Castille et de Leon duc de Lancastre"
in all documents from 1372 to 1388 and as I will try to show in a forthcoming
article in the Chaucer Review, Chaucer supports this claim in The Book of the
Duchess when he defines him as "this kyng" (1314).
23. (Crónicas, p. 627) " After entering Castile, there was a large
number of victims among his entourage, so that he lost many of his people, and
as it was well known, three hundred knights and squires and many archers and
other people died."
24. I am preparing a new article with the valuable help of Professor William
Askins, who has provide new and important data to complete this research. The
most striking and convincing data may be the finding of a record to support
the hypothesis of Philippa's death in Spain.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Baugh, A. 1968 "Chaucer the Man", Companion to Chaucer Studies, ed. Beryl Rowland. London: O.U.P.
Brewer, D.1978 Chaucer and his World. Suffolk: Boydell & Brewer.
Crow, M. M. & Clair Olson, eds. 1966Chaucer Life-Records. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Garbaty, T. J.1967 "Chaucer in Spain, 1366: Soldier of Fortune or Agent of the Crown?", Modern
Language Notes 5: 81-87.
Honori-Duvergi, S. 1955 "Chaucer en Espagne? (1366)," Recueil de travaux offert a M. Clovis Brunel
2: 9-13.
Howard, D. R. 1981 Chaucer: his Life, his Works, his World. New York: E. P. Dutton.
Martmn, J. L. ed. 1991 Pero Lspez de Ayala. Crsnicas. Barcelona: Planeta.
Pearsall, D. 1993 The Life of Geoffrey Chaucer. Oxford: Blackwell.
HOME PAGE